It seems today is Tax Freedom day.
I'd settle for it being a national holiday so we all get the day off from work. That'd make it something meaningful for me.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
America Celebrates Tax Freedom Day
Posted by
lottadot
at
11:22 AM
0
comments
Blackberry server names
The person at work responsible for ditching these Godforsaken Motorola-Q's did a trial period with an iPhone. But couldn't get iMap to work. And since it doesn't do native Microsoft Exchange (yet), it's been deemed we should all switch to something that does - so we are to have Blackberry's. Needless to say, this has had some in the IT department jabber channel bemoaning a bit. Consequently, being the good selfless IT staff that we are, we were helping our server minion setup the required-in-house-blackberry-server. (No, we didn't do any physical work, not even any clicking on 'install.exe', that's his job!) Here's what we came up with:
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
10:43 AM
0
comments
Labels: blackberry, iphone
I don't understand Twitter
There, I said it. I don't understand Twitter. Or more accurately, I don't understand the need for Twitter.
Ya see, I don't want everyone on the earth knowing what I do 24/7. I sure as hell don't want to have to go and type what I'm doing, in, all the time, either.
And honestly, I'm not sure that I want, nor need, to know what all my friends are doing all the time, either. I'd much rather be sitting down having a beer with them, or chatting on IM/IRC with them. I'd even settle for talking on the phone, which I thoroughly loath talking on the phone. But it'd be better then getting tweets from all of them.
Am I becoming an old curmudgeon? Or lazy? Or am I just being a realistic non-geek who has better things to do with my time?
Update: apparently I'm not the only one: Twitter Away Your Life With Social Networking.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
10:35 AM
0
comments
Labels: curmudgeon, Twitter
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Printing a photograph for above-the-mantel
I have only "professionaly" printed one of my photographs. I think the term to use is "Large Format Printing". I think the final size was 30x20. It was a request from someone who wanted it above their mantel. For this article's sake, let's assume it was similar to this one:
My problem was I knew next to nothing about printers. In fact, we have multiple color laser printers at work that do 8.5x11 normal sheet prints. Every single time I've attempted to use them, I had different results. Whether it was printing from driver version X, Y, Z, or color detail "high" or "photo" or printing straight from Photoshop or from Photoshop through Aperture. It all frustrated me enough that I've always tried desperately not to print anything. It's easier to email, post to flickr, .mac or just make a website/webpage to share the photos.
Then it just so happened that I went to a The Columbus Digital Photography and Photoshop Meetup Group meeting at a coffee house one evening and found out the organizer prints out many different photographs, some in very, very large sizes. I thought I'd hit the jackpot of knowledge! He recommended Signway Graphics . After much procrastination and surfing trying to figure out color spaces, bleeds, dimensions, pixel rules, etc, I relented and contacted Signway to have my print made.
And it turned out fantastic! Signway was great. The cost was very reasonable. You can take your photo(s) in on a USB drive/CD or email them. The owners are very, very, patient. I didn't know that much about how all this "print stuff" works.
Here are some of the things I learned through the process:
Megapixels File Resolution Print Size
High Quality (300dpi) Max(150dpi)
4 2664x1632 8"x5.5" 16.5"x11"
8 3264x2448 11"x8" 22"x16"
10 4290x2800 13"x8.5" 26"x17"
So, when I compare my Canon 40D
I get 3892 × 2586 (or 3888x2592). Which if you take a Pixels-per-Inch (PPI) of 300 that's 3888/300 = 12.96 inches wide by 2492/300 = 8.64 inches tall.
Whether I alter the PPI, downsize the photo, upsize it, or any combination thereof depends on the physical printing device that's being used.
You can use Photoshop or any image editting program to resize your digital file so you can print it bigger. Here is a link to a free how-to (using Photoshop). If you don't have photoshop, you can probably very easily adapt it to whatever image editting application you are using:
Resizing Practice Exercises for Photoshop CS2 Basics Lesson 2
This resizing seems to be an art in and of itself (like everything with this digital photgraphy stuff eh?)
I hope this helps someone. I'm definitely not an expert regarding any of this. But I spent a good bit of time surfing and skimming books at the library and Borders (and drinking coffee with the group!) trying to make heads or tails of it all. Hopefully this saved you some time.
One last prop: Signway Graphics.
Credits:
Canon 40d photo
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
8:52 AM
0
comments
Labels: Canon40d, Photography, Printing
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Single parents cost taxpayers bazillions
CNN posted an article from the AP titled Study: Single parents cost taxpayers $112 billion. The gist of it sponsors of the study are recommending lawmakers invest more money in programs aimed at strengthening marriages. Others, not associated with the study, question whether that's a good idea and instead recommend investing resources into programs for things such as job creation.
Such a program [bolster(ing) marriages] has been in place in Oklahoma since 2001; Texas last year earmarked about $15 million in federal funds for marriage education.
Let's see, what does a single parent need? Money? Yep, a job would help that (ignore child support). What about... oh... day care?!?. These states spending money on marriage-programs are fools. I wonder if those programs are being pushed by the religious right. The two states they mention, Oklahoma and Texas sure aren't known for their bible-beltedness.
Let me say it again - day care. A big third is education. And they can't take courses if they don't have day care. And most of them can't have day care without money.
Well, in Ohio single women used to have dirt-cheap near-free daycare if they were in school too. But our recent block-head governor got rid of that.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
5:45 PM
0
comments
Labels: childcare, government spending, politics
Monday, March 03, 2008
But what about Vermont?!?
I have not seen a single poll regarding tommorrow's primary in Vermont. As an Ohioan, I am truly concerned about what's happening in Vermont. Obviously, their results are going to influence so much of our future.
heh
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
8:45 PM
0
comments
Saturday, March 01, 2008
I was kicked out of the Arnold Classic...
I was kicked out of the 2008 Arnold Classic's Amateur IFBB International Female Bodybuilding competition because I didn't have a "pitpass".
Now, minutes before I had sat in the press area (for about an hour or 2) taking photographs of the Men's and Women's Arm Wrestling championships. I was watching the 2008 Arnold Classic Armwrestling Challenge (ACAC). I'd never been that close to something like that in my life. It was also my first time ever seeing true arm wrestling "done properly". Here's one of my frames:
I was right smack at the front of the stage. It was sweet!! (btw, the bearded man on the left side of the picture, George Iszakouits, has won the competition for six straight years now).
Then it was over and they started gearing up for the female competition. And that's when they started asking for these damn passes.
Which ironically I didn't happen to have ;) Arg!
See more of my Arnold Classic 2008 pictures in my Arnold Classic 2008 Flickr set.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
8:40 PM
0
comments
Labels: Arnold, Bodybuilding, Photography
Monday, February 18, 2008
Easy Rider Bike Expo and Concert
This weekend I went with Croz to the Easyrider Bike Show at Vet's in downtown Columbus. This was my first time at the show. I don't recall ever hearing about it in the past.
It turns out a friend of mine had his bike in the show and it took 2nd place in the Spectator's Class!
Here's a picture of just-the-bike:
Then we caught a concert by a band called Toyz. They
played some good ol classic rock tunes and were quite good.
Of course, we snapped some pictures :) I'll be putting them up on Flickr as soon as I get done editting them. I didn't realize they had concerts and events and stuff at a show like this - so I didn't bring the 70-200 lens :( Croz had his and was getting some sweet photo's of the band. My 17-55 just didn't have enough range to get in close :( I'll have to bring it with me next year! But it was the first time I'd ever sat in the front row for a concert!
Flickr Meet - CMH Bike Show Discussion
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
6:34 PM
0
comments
Labels: Motorcycles, Photography
Monday, February 11, 2008
Photography Blind
This weekend I did some "prep-work" to prepare for Turkey pictures this spring. I wanted to see how the Canon 40D would do w/ the Sigma 70-200 and the 2x converter. Here's a picture of the blind:
What I found out was the range I have w/ this camera and lens isn't much better then the 300D w/ the 70-300 Sigma lens (which I gave to my mom). However, since the 70-200 is a quicker lens it did better in low-light.
Oh, and watch out for condensation dripping off the top of the blind onto the lens, camera and yourself. Not fun. Very cold. And mice seem to like blinds that aren't used all that often :(
For the interested - some of my prior turkey pictures.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
6:33 PM
0
comments
Labels: hunting, Nature, Photography
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Flickr Meetup - Ohio Theatre Statistics
Apparently a few of you liked the Flickr group meetup stats I posted yesterday (see prior article). So much so that it was requested I run the stat-beast against the second tour, the tour of the Ohio Theatre.
Here's the nitty gritty:
There is a total of 210 images tagged with
flickr tag 'cmhflickrmeet092207', posted by
20 different people (ie flickr accounts). Average ISO Speed was 390.
The distribution of make of Cameras:
What modes were their cameras in?
Was Exposure Bias used?
And the top few Exposures used:
And the top few Apertures used:
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
8:18 AM
0
comments
Labels: Flickr, Meetup, Photography, Statistics
Monday, January 14, 2008
Flickr Meetup - Statehouse Tour Statistics
In May, 2007, our local Flickr group Flickr Meet - Columbus Ohio did a group tour of the Columbus Ohio StateHouse. Then in September we did a Tour of the Ohio Theatre. Now, thanks to croz1007 we are gearing up to do a tour of the Columbus Ohio Southern Theatre.
After seeing many of my photos that did not come out so well, and many more from others that came out great I was wondering what they did differently, that I didn't do?!? Then the thought occurred to me that I could look at the EXIF information from their photos. By looking at the photo to try and determine the circumstances of it's unique situation, and the EXIF, maybe I'd learn something.
And so I began clicking. And clicking. Then realized there's atleast 50 or more photos, and this wasn't going to work. Perl to the rescue! I spent part of yesterday's NFL football games tinkering with code and readin the Flickr and misc documentaiton. I ended up with a small perl script to generate some statistics. Here is what it found:
There is a total of 381 images tagged with
flickr tag 'cmhflickrmeet063007', posted by
17 different people (ie flickr accounts). Average ISO Speed was 550.
The distribution of make of Cameras:
What modes were their cameras in?
Was Exposure Bias used?
And the top few Exposures used:
And the top few Apertures used:
I don't know that this information will help anyone. Hell, I'm not sure it'll help me, since I spent all my time reading the Flickr API Documentation and poking around with a perl script instead of analyzing the pictures/data. Hopefully this week I will find the time to look through all the pictures and compare all the numbers.
Special thanks to the authors of the Flickr API as well as the 100% free-as-in-beer Perl Module Flickr::API and GD::Graph.
If you have any thoughts on whether this would be worthwhile to run after each meetup, or how it could be improved, please post a comment. Thanks!
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
8:44 AM
0
comments
Labels: Code, Flickr, Perl, Photography, Statistics
Friday, January 11, 2008
Music Labels scream Steal Our Tunes
Ok, I'll admit it. I like iTunes. Infact, I've purchased quite a bit of music from iTunes over the past few years inorder to feed my iPods. Some people, mostly geeks, sometimes ask "Why?" What they are really asking is is "Why would you purchase music from iTunes, that's DRM'd?"
My answer to this is fairly simple:
Now when I say "illegally share music" it's mainly when one of my kids comes over and says "Oh you have the new Korn CD. Can you burn it for me?".
It was one thing when the kids were younger and living at home. We all shared tapes, cd's, vcr movies, dvd's. 1 But now that they don't live here, I don't think that "sharing" is right. It's a different location (in our case, cities now). If they want a cd, they should purchase it just like everyone else in the world.
Or, when I am listening to something and a friend says "Oh, I love that song. Oh you have the entire CD, can you burn it for me?"
I want to scream "no!". 2
The point that I'm trying to make by all this typing is that the music industry is really screwing themselves by trying to obfuscate iTunes. When I've had friends ask me to burn them something I'd say "Sorry, I bought this from iTunes, it's encrypted, it won't let me share it". 3
That used to be the end of the discussion. Now they follow up with "Well, why didn't you just buy it from Amazon, stuff from there isn't encrypted."
And you know, they're right. The music downloaded from Amazon isn't encrypted. I can burn it, copy it, ftp it, nntp it, scp it, rsync it, share it, copy it to USB keychain devices, etc. Neighbors can come over and grab a copy and I can go over to their house and get a copy of what they just bought.
And the labels are trying to obfuscate iTunes? What complete idiots they are. I'm at the point where I think the labels get what they deserve. They finally had a system where most people using it were not hindered by the DRM. It's a popular online system, there is a lot of people using it. One would think the Music Labels would be extactic about this. People purchasing music that they can't so easily "just share with anyone".
No, instead the Music Labels are once again showing their greed. They want to distrubute the music on their own and garner all the profits from that. I cannot blame them from wanting to maximize profit from the content they own. However, it took them so many years before they finally had a system like iTunes. And now they are screwing with it.
I think the Music Labels are idiots.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
7:08 AM
0
comments
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Hayden Falls Photos
For those of you who are always saying "I should stop at Hayden Falls" and never have, here's a picture of it for you:
I've been in Columbus for a number of years, kept telling my self I'd go there. And never did. The falls are smack in the middle of suburbia and easy to get to. When it was in the 60's earlier this week I couldn't resist finally going. It was late in the day so I had to be careful trying to pick an aperture/shutter/iso to get enough light at the bottom of the canyon. I treated the whole thing like an exercise from my new book "Understanding Exposure" by Bryan Peterson.
I also attempted to "stop motion" of water:
Though that didn't come out so well.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
7:30 PM
0
comments
Labels: Canon 40d, Photography, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 70-200
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
Richardson calls it quits?!?
New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson quits his Presidential Bid. His campaign didn't do all that well in Iowa nor New Hampshire.
I first heard mention of this while listening to the local NPR station on the way home from my CMH Digital Photography and Photoshop Meetup Group meeting at a local coffee place. It wasn't suprising, considering he'd not done that well in the primaries.
Earlier, before I left for the meeting, during Hardball someone piped up that Richardson was never in it to be the President - instead his goal was the vice-presidency. I'd never heard that before. I don't know whether to chaulk it up to Hardball BS or what. Who knows. I guess time will tell.
I had always assumed that there'd be a large part of the population that won't vote for a black man. Then another large part that won't vote for a woman. (Note: I'm not advocating either way of thinking, but I've travelled the US and though no one seems to want to say it, those two Democratic front-runners have an uphill battle in parts of the US, misguided the reasoning may be). Therefore this situation would leave Richardson set for the position (besides the fact that he seemed to have a lot of experience and knowledge w/ foreign policy).
With Richardson out, maybe Edwards will be in this so-called pole-position in waiting out the struggle between Obama and Clinton.
Oh, CNN is running similar so it must be true. ;)
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
10:28 PM
0
comments
Labels: politics
Real Life Mobile Penryn vs Merom Benchmarks
Mac Rumors has an article saying there will be new MacBook Pro's with the just-released Penryn processors. According to Anandtech this will yield up to a 40 % increase in some applications.
This all figures, seeing as I just received my new 17" MacBook Pro 2 weeks ago.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
9:05 PM
0
comments
Labels: Apple, laptop, macbook pro, penryn, performance
Sunday, January 06, 2008
Poor Hugo Chavez
Poor Hugo Chavez. He just can't win. He tried to use a hostage situation to embarass Columbia. Even Oliver Stone joined in the frey, hoping to embarass the Bush Administration. It turns out it was a setup - he was totally played by the jungle rebels.
But ya know what? When you go to bed with dogs, you generally wake up with fleas.
And that's exactly what happened. Chavez has to feel like he was played the fool - because he was.
The true winner in the whole ordeal was Oliver Stone - he walks away with a Movie deal.
Political hostage's son found in Bogota
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
10:15 AM
3
comments
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Battle-Tested and the NFL?
I think the NFL should ban the word "Battle Tested" from all game announcements and broadcasts.
- they aren't fighting in a battle (infact most of the current players probably never have)
- they aren't having things shot at them
- they aren't fighting (for democracy)
Maybe, just maybe, if a player is playing in Cleveland, they are battle-tested. Afterall, they do on occasion have illegally-smuggled-contraband thrown at them.
Oh, and Andrea Kremer's nose and mouth look exactly like Edie Falco's. >>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
10:05 PM
0
comments
Labels: battle, broadcasters, NFL
Brandweek and Chevy Malibu
Brandweek says "GM Can't Stock Malibus".
I wonder if the thought "A good product sells itself" ever crossed their minds. Or here's another: "Gee, a link to the product we're referring to would be great". Maybe Chevy told them not to link directly to the Malibu, fearing even more backorders for the vehicle.
Did you get that not linking to the product you're discussing annoys the crap out of me?
The funny thing is, I saw an add for the car yesterday and I thought "Now that's a sharp car. I wonder how Chevy came up with it?". Then today I saw the article in Brandweek's RSS feed.
It's ironic how a branding website would determine GM can't stock the car because of Marketing success.
Links: Motortrends Malibu 2008 pictures and Google Image Search.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
7:22 PM
0
comments
Labels: automobiles, branding, chevy, malibu, marketing
Realtime wildlife watching (deer/turkey)
Today I first read about "The Bug" over at Engadget's CES coverage website. Their article about The Bug's Announcement got my curiosity going. They didn't have a link to The Bug's website in the article, so I found it.
All I can say is this thing looks cool! My first thought when I read this was "I could build a realtime deer/turkey watching device!" I couldn't find the exact specs for the camera on their website. I don't know if that's because there aren't any specifications online yet, or the fact that I gave up looking fairly quickly because I can smell the food my wife's preparing for dinner.
But the bug's apparently got it's own rechargable battery. If it's waterproof, and the battery is big enough (your you can wire it to a big d++ battery(ies)) then you could leave it broadcasting to your wifi unit and pickup relatively live camera feed from it. Toss in some motion detection analysis of every-few-frames and it would be very cool. On one of the pages they advertise a developer-kit. I think I read it's free. Well, if they have any common sense it'd be free. Oh, and work on OSX, too :)
Concerns for now: waterproofedness, battery life, cost, developer tools and framework, convincing my wife this is worth shelling out large cash for it
Update: Subversion checkout: svn://bugcommunity.com/
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
5:28 PM
0
comments
Labels: camera, deer, outdoor, Photography, the bug, turkey, wildlife
Everyone's leaving Ohio!
Our local newspaper, The Columbus Dispatch, has an article titled "More people leaving Ohio". Basically, the article is stating that more people are leaving Ohio then coming here. This claim is based on the fact that United Van Lines says for the 15th consecutive year, 57% percent of the moves they have made are out of Ohio.
No one should be suprised hearing this news. That's right, absolutely no one.
Ohio's Economy sucks. We have auto plants closing, or near-closing every year. Many of those who worked in the manufacturing industry that we've known over years, are gone, retired (not by choice) or are working in jobs that are no where near as advanced (nor well paying) as what they were doing in the steel and auto industries. Some of our cities don't rank well. Topics of discussion with family members are often dominated with the debate of whether to accept the then-current early retirement package being offered by insert manufacturing company with a union here.
We in Ohio cannot seem to keep religious matters from imposing upon everyone in the state. We seem to have religious wacko's coming out of the wood work (ahem, from the Cincinati area) working to tell everyone how to act. Will the young people in our state stay in such an environment? No, they won't. Look at the populations of some states out west. They are closing grade schools because there is no young population base that's marrying and having kids to supply the schools. They're all leaving or already left (we have family in Oklahoma, someday I'll write about that).
The higher-education situation in Ohio sucks too. For a few years now, there've been a lot Ohioans going to North Carolina (and obviously other states). Why? Because it's cheaper to go there in-order to send their kids to college. Yes, for a few years they are paying NC's out-of-state tuition rate, but it's far cheaper to do so then stay in Ohio and pay Ohio's in-state rates. Obviously, after you've moved down south to educate your family, and enjoyed the warmer temperatures, why would you move back to Ohio? Answer: you won't.
The last 15 years of "Republican Control" have stagnated Ohio's Economy. The decision to cut higher education funding (hence force the Colleges to significantly increase their rates) immediately started killing Ohio's economy because it's becoming near impossible for many people to send their kids to state schools. Prior to this, in-state schools were always the cheaper schools to send your children to. Another boneheaded cut - From 2001 to 2003 Ohio cut $268 million out of their child care assistance fund. If you have a part of our population who aren't making squat, have children, want to goto college and will eventually have a decent income from having gone to college why would you cut their knees out from underneath them? If they cannot afford childcare, they won't attend college. It's that simple; Help them help themselves to earn a decent income and fuel that tax base.
Thankfully Ken Blackwell didn't win the election. We'd already discussed how soon we could relocate out of the state if he'd won.
This all lends itself to a higher-education brain-drain throughout the state. Who thinks that will help attract industry? (I will admit the decision to drop Ohio's Tangible Personal Property Tax was a smart, belated, move).
If you have no people, you have no tax base. That's a brow-raising thought isn't it? Look out west for what Ohio could easily become.
>>Keep Reading: Full Post and Comments
Posted by
lottadot
at
3:08 PM
0
comments
Labels: economy, ohio, politics, population